Michael Booth 7,364 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 Ok, Harambe shouldn't have to be killed. The zoo had no choice. They could not dart him because in the time it took the tranquiliser to work that little boy could well be dead. She may be a rubbish Mum or a good Mum who took her eye off the ball for a few seconds - I DON'T KNOW. He may be a naughty, unruly child or an adventurous, curious four year old - I DON'T KNOW. What I DO KNOW is that no way on earth should that child have been able to climb into a Gorilla enclosure. It is the Zoo's responsibility to ensure that it is impossible for ANY visitor to gain access to ANY animal enclosure. FACT !!! 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 I'm with you Michael.. apparently no secondary fencing either..great shame all 'round. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick2me 3,033 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poohbear 1,360 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 Zoos have this mentality of wanting a natural look without bars spoiling the view...all very well but it just isn't safe.A simple mesh barrier could have saved the life of a boy who died after falling into the African Wild Dogs enclosure at a zoo a while back.Kids will climb and don't see the dangers...come to that neither do some adults. Someone somewhere decided whether or not this area was safe for a public audience...I'd like to know who.....Health & Safety, who we often treat as a joke (This isn't about playing conkers)...or do the zoos decide for themselves? If this was a school playground next to a motorway there would be a kid proof fence around the perimeter.Zoo exhibits should be treated as seriously. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NewBasfordlad 3,599 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 The only two innocents in this story the 4 year old child and the keeper who took the shot. Both the zoo and the parents have to take some responsibility. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick2me 3,033 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 And the gorilla, who did not belong there. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ayupmeducks 1,730 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 From some witnesses, the Mother was not supervising her brat, it appears it took the kid a fair while to get under the fence, which had been checked and passed a few weeks early by federal authorities. That's the problem over here these days, kids running around screaming while the Mother is on the phone yacking away. From what I gather she looks like she might end up with charges of child neglect being filed against her. The Ape was born in Texas Mick, so don't think he'd have survived being set loose in the wild. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick2me 3,033 Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 Then his mother should not have been there. EDIT, The ape and the kid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
banjo48 928 Posted June 2, 2016 Report Share Posted June 2, 2016 Never been a fan of any zoo ! we should do more to protect their natural environment. Wild animals should be free. As for the mother, enough said ! we see far too much of these "new age" parents who , for one reason or another, have no control over their brats whatsoever. The whole debacle is disgusting. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Booth 7,364 Posted June 2, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2016 banjo48, I totally agree with your comment, 'Never been a fan of any zoo ! we should do more to protect their natural environment. Wild animals should be free.' The problem is that there's less and less space for wild animals on Earth as their habitat is bulldozed over. The Human Race think they're doing the animals a favour by sticking them in a zoo. I could cry when I see reports of the cruelty that's inflicted on animals in some of these places. I put this photo on a different thread a day or so ago but I think it's relevant to this thread. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FLY2 10,109 Posted June 2, 2016 Report Share Posted June 2, 2016 I agree Michael. If you want to see bears, get off to Canada or Alaska. If you want to see gorillas, big cats, elephants, hippos, et al, then get off to Africa. If you can't afford it, then tough s**t. Watch wildlife programmes. Harsh, I know, but who are we as humans to decide where animals should live in captivity. Endangered species...... Well they wouldn't be if we didn't expand solely in search of a quick buck. (Pun not intended). 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.