mick2me 3,033 Posted June 28, 2009 Report Share Posted June 28, 2009 MJ was known as a practical joker Quote Link to post Share on other sites
poohbear 1,360 Posted June 28, 2009 Report Share Posted June 28, 2009 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
firbeck 859 Posted June 28, 2009 Report Share Posted June 28, 2009 MJ was known as a practical joker That explains everything, he was striving to look like Co-Co the Clown, and more than succeeded. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mariag 4 Posted June 29, 2009 Report Share Posted June 29, 2009 Was watching interviews on sky news for MJs friends - robin gibb - and you would think they were talking about a completely different man ..... how he like junk food (he hasn't eaten in yonks), he was a 'regular' guy -eh what? Had he been a non celebrity he would've been locked up for his behaviour alone! I did read that he was so obsessed with his nose and its surgery, that a plastic surgeon had to put him under and pretend to do more work on it.... there was nothing else to be done to it it was collapsing. How true that was I don't know, but it is such a shame as he was a lovely little' black' lad and made a mockery of himself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rockinbaz42 0 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Just to put my point of view to this discussion. Michael Jackson was a brilliant singer/dancer and i loved his music. As for being a peodo i never will believe that. For a start anybody who was abused as a child would never put any other kid through the same thing, and as for him sharing his bed with children its because he was like a child himself and i think very mis understood! And it is only peoples dirty minds that think it is anything else! What a load of nonsense Quote Link to post Share on other sites
firbeck 859 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Georgygirl I see you are on line, I'd like your comments as to my posting 49, I don't think I was, or intend to be, horrible, towards your obvious hero, I'm just trying to look at facts, not sick jokes, though that shows what the British public, not blinded fans, really thought of this strange man who's assisted talent vanished many years ago. He's had more publicity than Lennon had when he was killed, and quite frankly, there's no comparison. Lennon made his own carreer, Jackson was beaten into a pulp to do it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mr rob t 11 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 There is one members input i would like to see on this subject................Craig where are you? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Georgygirl 0 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Firbeck, yes you see me online, I cannot avoid that happening, however you also see that I am not entering onto this thread up till now. I prefer not to have anything to do with this topic, as it would not matter what I said, it would be distorted and torn to shreds. Let the people have their fun, I just refuse to add any fuel. just one thing, I was not a M.J. fan, just a human being like he was. Georgygirl. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Fynger 841 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Just found in the news Michael Jackson cut his father out of his last will in a move that would deprive him of a share in the singer's fortune, it has been reported. The Wall Street Journal said the document, which was drafted in 2002, divides the pop star's estate between his mother, three children and a number of charities. So he gets the last laugh anyway. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
littlebro 234 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Documents obtained by the Associated Press today show Jackson had $567.6m in assets, including his Neverland Ranch and rights to songs by the Beatles, but had debts of $331m, leaving him with a net worth of $236.6m. The documents were dated 2007. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
littlebro 234 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Michael Jackson was reportedly not the biological father of the three children he raised. Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his three children, TMZ.com reported Tuesday. Jackson’s children were all conceived in vitro with sperm from unknown donors. Debbie Rowe is also reportedly not the biological mother of the two eldest children she carried, “Prince” Michael Joseph Jr., 12, and Paris Michael Katherine, 11. Rowe simply acted as a surrogate and was paid a great deal for her services. Jackson’s third and youngest child, Prince (Blanket) Michael II, 7, was carried by a surrogate mother who never knew the identity of the receiving parent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rockinbaz42 0 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Just to put my point of view to this discussion. Michael Jackson was a brilliant singer/dancer and i loved his music. As for being a peodo i never will believe that. For a start anybody who was abused as a child would never put any other kid through the same thing, and as for him sharing his bed with children its because he was like a child himself and i think very mis understood! And it is only peoples dirty minds that think it is anything else! He was a homosexual paedophilic child molester.... end of story Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick2me 3,033 Posted June 30, 2009 Report Share Posted June 30, 2009 Was he found guilty of any of these alegations? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mariag 4 Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Michael Jackson was reportedly not the biological father of the three children he raised. Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his three children, TMZ.com reported Tuesday. Jackson’s children were all conceived in vitro with sperm from unknown donors. Debbie Rowe is also reportedly not the biological mother of the two eldest children she carried, “Prince” Michael Joseph Jr., 12, and Paris Michael Katherine, 11. Rowe simply acted as a surrogate and was paid a great deal for her services. Jackson’s third and youngest child, Prince (Blanket) Michael II, 7, was carried by a surrogate mother who never knew the identity of the receiving parent. Bought to order - how low can you get. I didn't hear about Debbie Rowe not even being biological mother - it just gets worse. I remember reading when one of the older children was born that Michael was off with the baby before the placenta had been delivered..... real fruitcake - in all fairness he should've been sectioned Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick2me 3,033 Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 He was a pretty good dancer, by all accounts? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ashley 288 Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 theres just as good in every bar in turkey most nights! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stan 386 Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 theres just as good in every bar in turkey most nights! ...explains why he hasn`t had any recent Hittites! Also why he did not go `cold turkey'( in case he sprained his Ankara).(Japanese Turk). I have a mass of Michael Jackson jokes(sent to me from NZ) but do not want to offend anyone on the site.Will forward if requested. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
firbeck 859 Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 I think that there's only one person thats been offended Stan, and she's probably off to Neverland to weep and wail in front of the glass coffin. I've heard he only weighed 8 stone when he snuffed it and by all accounts he was a tall bloke, I hope they've replaced all his internal organs with something more substantial, like a few bags of cement. I like the new deal on the concert tickets, yes you can get your money back, but why not instead keep the ticket, with no refund, Wacko Jacko designed it himself, it'll make you a fortune on E-bay. Did you see the mansion in Kent that the concert promoters had rented for a year at the cost of £1m so he'd have somewhere half decent to stay in, they'd also refurbished it to Mr Jacksons taste, how much was that then, I thought he was broke, couldn't he have stayed in digs in Hackney, much nearer to the 02 stadium, less of a pushbike journey as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
firbeck 859 Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 All this fiddling with the system certainly killed this subject dead. Did anyone see the film shown constantly on TV yesterday with Jackson rehearsing for his show just before he died. Was it me, while the media reporters seemed to be waxing lyrical about him, I thought he looked more like a corpse than he did on 'Thriller', he was skinny, half starved and his movements were slow and unco-ordinated, the dancers behind him were making a mockery of him, he also didn't appear to be with it at all, I wasn't the only one that thought the same. By a great sense of timing, last night, BBC2 showed a concert recorded last year of Stevie Wonder in action. The black music industry and Jackson fans obviously forgot about him when they were delivering their weeping and wailing over MJ. Another former child star, with the disadvantage of being blind, but able to write, produce and even play all his own material, an hours worth of classic songs, impeccably performed and delivered. Also notably present was his REAL daughter, Aisha Morris, on backing vocals, rather attractive she was too, and black. What a contrast, Stevie Wonder, black, proud, overwieght, nearly 60, but still able to deliver. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ashley 288 Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 what the **** happened there? never touched anything! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rockinbaz42 0 Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Was he found guilty of any of these alegations? Nope, he was'nt. But then again Sony could'nt afford to have their biggest asset locked away in Jail. You can't sell records from a prison cell, ask Gary Glitter. And when you got all that money and have access to some of the most powerful lawyers in the world and the American jury selection system you got a better than even chance of getting the result you want. And don't forget the fact that he paid Jordie Chandler's family $22 million hush money to stop 'em spilling the beans even more. Now why did he do that I wonder? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frank 13 Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 what the **** happened there? never touched anything! I've deleted it for you now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stan 386 Posted July 11, 2009 Report Share Posted July 11, 2009 All this fiddling with the system certainly killed this subject dead. Did anyone see the film shown constantly on TV yesterday with Jackson rehearsing for his show just before he died. Was it me, while the media reporters seemed to be waxing lyrical about him, I thought he looked more like a corpse than he did on 'Thriller', he was skinny, half starved and his movements were slow and unco-ordinated, the dancers behind him were making a mockery of him, he also didn't appear to be with it at all, I wasn't the only one that thought the same. By a great sense of timing, last night, BBC2 showed a concert recorded last year of Stevie Wonder in action. The black music industry and Jackson fans obviously forgot about him when they were delivering their weeping and wailing over MJ. Another former child star, with the disadvantage of being blind, but able to write, produce and even play all his own material, an hours worth of classic songs, impeccably performed and delivered. Also notably present was his REAL daughter, Aisha Morris, on backing vocals, rather attractive she was too, and black. What a contrast, Stevie Wonder, black, proud, overwieght, nearly 60, but still able to deliver. But not for this school teacher! British teacher snapped and smashed a teenage student in the head with a 2kg metal weight after being heckled to a Michael Jackson tune, reports claim. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Beefsteak 305 Posted July 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2009 Just read this on another site and thought it very apt :- A Soldier's Take on Michael Jackson's Death This is written by a young soldier serving his third tour of duty in Iraq. Thought you might find his take on the Michael Jackson news interesting and he's right. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Folks, Okay, I need to rant. I was just watching the news, and I caught part of a report on Michael Jackson. As we all know, Jackson died the other day. He was an entertainer who performed for decades. He made millions, he spent millions, and he did a lot of things that make him a villian to many people. I understand that his death would affect a lot of people, and I respect those people who mourn his death, but that isn't the point of my rant. Why is it that when ONE man dies, the whole of America loses their minds with grief. When a man dies whose only contribution to the country was to ENTERTAIN people, the Amercian people find the need to flock to a memorial in Hollywood, and even Congress sees the need to hold a "moment of silence" for his passing? Am I missing something here? ONE man dies, and all of a sudden he's a freaking martyr because he entertained us for a few decades? What about all those SOLDIERS who have died to give us freedom? All those Soldiers who, knowing that they would be asked to fight in a war, still raised their hands and swore to defend the Constitution and the United States of America. Where is their moment of silence? Where are the people flocking to their graves or memorials and mourning over them because they made the ultimate sacrifice? Why is it when a Soldier dies, there are more people saying "good riddence," and "thank God for IEDs?" When did this country become so calloused to the sacrifice of GOOD MEN and WOMEN, that they can arbitrarily blow off their deaths , and instead, throw themselves into mourning for a "Pop Icon?" I think that if they are going to hold a moment of silence IN CONGRESS for Michael Jackson, they need to hold a moment of silence for every service member killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. They need to PUBLICLY recognize every life that has been lost so that the American people can live their callous little lives in the luxury and freedom that WE, those that are living and those that have gone on, have provided for them. But, wait, that would take too much time, because there have been so many willing to make that sacrifice. After all, we will never make millions of dollars. We will never star in movies, or write hit songs that the world will listen too. We only shed our blood, sweat and tears so that people can enjoy what they have. Sorry if I have offended, but I needed to say it. Remember these five words the next time you think of someone who is serving in the military; "So that others may live..." Isaac Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Fynger 841 Posted July 12, 2009 Report Share Posted July 12, 2009 oh ...and now he was murdered Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.