LizzieM 9,514 Posted April 19, 2013 Report Share Posted April 19, 2013 Ok, nothing to do with immunisations in 2013, nor in the past 50 or 60 years, but we buried my dear old Dad this week in the same grave as his 7 year old brother who died of Measles in 1937. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paulus 541 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 In Scotland, the peck was used as a dry measure until the introduction of imperial units as a result of the Weights and Measures Act of 1824. The peck was equal to about 9 litres (1.98 Imp gal) (in the case of certain crops, such as wheat, peas, beans and meal) and about 13 litres (2.86 Imp gal) (in the case of barley, oats and malt). A firlot was equal to 4 pecks and the peck was equal to 4 lippies or forpets. [source Wikipedia] I've always liked Firkin as a measure..................Firkin, Firkin, Firkin............ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
katyjay 5,091 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 There is [or was] a Firkin Brewery in St Andrews. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick2me 3,033 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 Can anyone tell my why they taught us about Firkin Chains and Furlongs? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StephenFord 866 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 No idea why - but a firkin of beer (according to the omniscient - but sometimes wrong - Wikipedia) is 9 imperial gallons (or 40.91481 litres). However a firkin of wine is 70 imperial gallons or about 318 litres - that's a lot of stuff to sup ! I do remember doing some elementary surveying on the playing field at Long Eaton Grammar School under the tutelage of the late and fondly remembered Ken Plampin, using a proper surveyer's chain. (22 yards = 1 chain, 10 chains = 1 furlong, 8 furlongs = 1 mile). (Sorry - this has wandered rather a long way off the subject of measles!) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Limey 242 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 Which also brings up some other British measuring oddities - some of recent origin like why on earth do you buy petrol in litres, but measure fuel consumption in miles per gallon? Many years ago Motor magazine had a discussion on odd measurements, the conclusion of which was that speed should be measured in furlongs per fortnight! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick2me 3,033 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 Is that miles to English Gallon or miles to American gallon? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StephenFord 866 Posted April 21, 2013 Report Share Posted April 21, 2013 In short Eric, we would happily buy fuel in gallons, but it's not allowed now. (Actually most people now buy it by monetary value irrespective of quantity). However as you know miles continue to be the measure of distance - not kilometres, so miles are bound to be involved in economy figures - and I guess miles per litre or litres per hundred miles would be a bit of a lash-up. Obviously measuring the distance obtained from a given quantity is strictly a measure of fuel economy rather than fuel consumption (the higher the figure the better the economy). I am, of course, an old curmudgeon, but it has long been my view that the imperial measurements came in useful and practical sizes and quantities, whereas metric goes for units that are either too big or too small. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Compo 10,328 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 I love the thought of furlongs per fortnight - that's about my speed. I have a real chain measure and I once posted a photo of it on here somewhere. can't find it now; perhaps someone can help? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Compo 10,328 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Found it [1 Imperial chain or 22yds] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
littlebro 234 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Only use of a chain is to mark out a cricket wicket - or has these been converted to metric yet? Only use of a furlong is horse racing. Best ponder the two above with a firkin of ale? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Compo 10,328 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 The Imperial gallon is defined as the volume of 10lb of water at 62°F, which works out at 277.4194 cubic inches. Ale measures 9 gallons = 1 firkin 4 firkins = 1 barrelBrilliant! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StephenFord 866 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Only use of a chain is to mark out a cricket wicket - or has these been converted to metric yet? Only use of a furlong is horse racing. Best ponder the two above with a firkin of ale? After 9 gallons of falling-over water I suspect you may not be doing much pondering at all ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
littlebro 234 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Hic........ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ayupmeducks 1,730 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 And the chain was used in mining surveying, pre the surveyors tape..Imagine carrying a chain miles and miles down low roadways!! Usually the job of the trainee surveyor or lines lads. Here's what Wiki says. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunter%27s_chain 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Compo 10,328 Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Agriculture also used the chain. It was an agricultural advisers' office that gave me my chain. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StephenFord 866 Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 I think that may have been its original use - I have a vague memory (well, you all knew that!) - a vague memory of history lessons about mediaeval field systems being measured out in this way. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stan 386 Posted April 27, 2013 Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 Back to measles.Off the beach here we have had a massive fish kill,and many juvenile Dolphin deaths. Same virus that causes measles and distemper in dogs. With the massive fish kill and Dolphin deaths,now we know about the cause,we need to know how the virus infected the animals.Interesting how similar it is to the canine variety.Morbillivirus infections which were not documented in aquatic mammals until 1988, have caused at least five epizootics in these species during the last 10 yearsAntigenic and molecular biological studies indicate that a newly discovered morbillivirus, termed phocine distemper virus, and canine distemper virus were responsible for recent pinniped epizootics; cetacean die-offs were caused by strains of a second, newly recognized cetacean morbillivirus. Serological evidence of morbillivirus infection has been identified in a broad range of marine mammal populations and recent epizootics probably resulted from transfer of virus to immunologically-naive populations. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Booth 7,364 Posted April 27, 2013 Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 Phew, it took some doing but I read it to the end, Stan...lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stan 386 Posted April 27, 2013 Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 Phew, it took some doing but I read it to the end, Stan...lol It`s a good job I added the simplified version then ... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick2me 3,033 Posted April 27, 2013 Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 As me old dad would have said... "Stan - thats easy for you to say" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bubblewrap 3,815 Posted April 28, 2013 Report Share Posted April 28, 2013 My stepson(27) has just come down with a mild case of mumps & hehas had the MMR jab too. Question. when did a jab for mumps(just mumps & not MMR) first become available? My mother(83) says I had one when I was a nipper but I think a jab for mumps didn't come out till after I had left school in 1965. I have not had mumps .............................................yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stan 386 Posted April 28, 2013 Report Share Posted April 28, 2013 The MMR vaccine is very effective against measles, mumps, and rubella, but it is not perfect. MMR vaccine reduces the risk of getting mumps, especially if you get two doses. People who have received two doses of the MMR vaccine are about 9 times less likely to get mumps than unvaccinated people who have the same exposure to mumps virus. However, some people who received two doses of MMR can still get mumps, especially if they have an intense exposure to the mumps virus. If they do get mumps, people who have been vaccinated are likely to have less severe illness than unvaccinated people with mumps. MMR -UK 1988 Bubblewrap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bubblewrap 3,815 Posted April 28, 2013 Report Share Posted April 28, 2013 Yes but what about a Mumps only vaccine ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stan 386 Posted April 28, 2013 Report Share Posted April 28, 2013 Developed 1948. Used first 1949.(Mumps only) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.